Combining Decision Procedures for Sorted Theories
نویسندگان
چکیده
The Nelson-Oppen combination method combines decision procedures for theories satisfying certain conditions into a decision procedure for their union. While the method is known to be correct in the setting of unsorted first-order logic, some current implementations of it appear in tools that use a sorted input language. So far, however, there have been no theoretical results on the correctness of the method in a sorted setting, nor is it obvious that the method in fact lifts as is to logics with sorts. To bridge this gap between the existing theoretical results and the current implementations, we extend the Nelson-Oppen method to (order-)sorted logic and prove it correct under conditions similar to the original ones. From a theoretical point of view, the extension is relevant because it provides a rigorous foundation for the application of the method in a sorted setting. From a practical point of view, the extension has the considerable added benefits that in a sorted setting the method’s preconditions become easier to satisfy in practice, and the method’s nondeterminism is generally reduced.
منابع مشابه
Combining Decision Procedures for Theories in Sorted Logics
The Nelson-Oppen combination method combines decision procedures for theories satisfying certain conditions into a decision procedure for their union. While the method is known to be correct in the setting of unsorted first-order logic, some current implementations of it appear in tools that use a sorted input language. So far, however, there have been no theoretical results on the correctness ...
متن کاملConnecting Many-Sorted Theories
Basically, the connection of two many-sorted theories is obtained by taking their disjoint union, and then connecting the two parts through connection functions that must behave like homomorphisms on the shared signature. We determine conditions under which decidability of the validity of universal formulae in the component theories transfers to their connection. In addition, we consider varian...
متن کاملCombining Non-stably Infinite, Non-first Order Theories
A crucial step in the assertional verification of concurrent programs is deciding whether some sets of literals are satisfiable or not. In this context, the Nelson-Oppen combination scheme is often used. This scheme combines decision procedures for two disjoint theories into a decision procedure for the union of these theories. However, the standard version of the Nelson-Oppen technique tackles...
متن کاملUniication in the Union of Disjoint Equational Theories: Combining Decision Procedures Uniication in the Union of Disjoint Equational Theories: Combining Decision Procedures
Most of the work on the combination of uniication algorithms for the union of disjoint equational theories has been restricted to algorithms which compute nite complete sets of uniiers. Thus the developed combination methods usually cannot be used to combine decision procedures, i.e., algorithms which just decide solvability of uniication problems without computing uniiers. In this paper we des...
متن کاملCombining Shostak Theories
Ground decision procedures for combinations of theories are used in many systems for automated deduction. There are two basic paradigms for combining decision procedures. The Nelson–Oppen method combines decision procedures for disjoint theories by exchanging equality information on the shared variables. In Shostak’s method, the combination of the theory of pure equality with canonizable and so...
متن کامل